This study evaluates the municipal solid waste (MSW) management system in Chitrakoot, which encompasses Nagar Palika Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) and Nagar Parishad Chitrakoot (Madhya Pradesh), for the year 2024, using a structured analytical framework based on SWOT analysis. The findings highlight that waste generation has increased significantly in both municipalities due to population growth, tourism, and changing consumption patterns. Waste collection is primarily conducted through door-to-door services and manual scavenging, with the support of available sanitation workers and basic transportation services. However, the system faces significant challenges, including limited source segregation, inadequate landfill management, lack of modern treatment technologies, and insufficient infrastructure for recycling and proper disposal. Opportunities exist in adopting decentralized composting, biogas systems, waste-to-energy options, multi-bin waste sorting, and public-private partnerships, as well as in strengthening community awareness. Threats include increasing waste volumes, uncontrolled dumping, environmental pollution, poor enforcement of waste regulations, and associated health risks. Overall, this study highlights the need for modernized infrastructure, improved technology integration, policy compliance, and active community involvement to improve the sustainability and efficiency of municipal solid waste management in Chitrakoot.
Introduction
Rapid urbanization and population growth in India, coupled with economic and lifestyle changes, have intensified challenges in municipal solid waste (MSW) management. Globally, waste generation is expected to reach 3.4 billion tons by 2050, highlighting the need for sustainable waste management systems. In India’s Chitrakoot region, MSW management is complicated by semi-arid climate, pilgrimage-related population influx, and limited resources.
SWOT Analysis for MSWM in Chitrakoot:
Strengths (23.1%): Positive aspects include established waste collection centers, door-to-door waste collection, low-cost composting, awareness programs, and a dedicated workforce.
Weaknesses (30.8%): Major shortcomings are inefficient dumping and street cleaning, poor food waste sorting, limited recycling, insufficient waste bins, unscientific disposal, and lack of advanced processing technology.
Opportunities (26.9%): Potential improvements include installing biogas units, government and industry support, a five-bin segregation system, waste-to-energy projects, public-private partnerships, and community awareness programs.
Threats (19.2%): Risks involve environmental pollution from open dumping, rising waste generation, health hazards, ineffective policy implementation, and uncontrolled urban waste.
Methodology:
Assessment covered waste generation, composition, collection, separation, transportation, and disposal.
Data was collected via structured questionnaires from municipal officers, sanitation workers, residents, and contractors.
Weighted scoring revealed that weaknesses dominate the system, while opportunities and existing strengths provide guidance for improvement.
Key Findings:
MSWM in Chitrakoot has foundational strengths but significant operational gaps.
Strategic interventions, including technology adoption, public-private cooperation, and community participation, are essential for sustainable waste management.
The overall weighted score of the system is 4.846/10, indicating moderate performance with room for improvement.
Conclusion
The comprehensive assessment, based on a SWOT analysis of municipal solid waste management in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh) for 2024 and supported by a structured survey of municipal staff, sanitation workers, households, and local stakeholders, highlights significant operational strengths but also reveals significant systemic limitations.
In Nagar Palika Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh), total annual waste generation reached 5,007.94 ton/year with an average daily production of 13.88 ton/day reflecting rapid urban growth, tourism pressure, and changing consumption patterns. In Nagar Parishad Chitrakoot (M.P.), annual MSW generation is approximately 1,176.32 tons/year corresponding to a daily waste load of approximately 3.22 tons/day indicating a lower but steadily increasing waste flow. The questionnaire responses further reinforced the observed shortcomings in waste separation practices, transportation efficiency, workforce skills, and public participation, while also validating the strengths of well-established door-to-door collection systems and the availability of trained healthcare workers. Major weaknesses, such as limited waste separation, inadequate landfill management, insufficient treatment technologies, and low recycling capacity, continue to limit the system\'s efficiency. Opportunities such as decentralized composting, biogas production, the adoption of waste-to-energy systems, multi-container systems, and public-private partnerships offer significant potential for modernization. Meanwhile, increasing waste volumes, unregulated dumping, poor regulatory enforcement, and environmental health risks pose persistent threats. Overall, the findings demonstrate that while a basic framework for municipal solid waste management (MSWM) exists in both ULBs, the questionnaire-based perspectives emphasize the urgent need for infrastructure improvements, science-based treatment facilities, better technology integration, stronger policy enforcement, and active community engagement to achieve a sustainable and resilient waste management system for Chitrakoot.
References
[1] Allesch, A., & Brunner, P. H. (2014). Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review. Waste Management & Research, 32(6), 461–473
[2] Bhide, A. D., & Sundersan, B. B. (1983). Solid waste management in developing countries. Indian National Scientific Documentation Center, New Delhi, India.
[3] Del Moro, G., Barca, E., Cassano, D., Di Iaconi, C., Mascolo, G., & Brunetti, G. (2014). Landfill wall revegetation combined with leachate recirculation: A convenient procedure for management of closed landfills. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(15), 9366– 9375.
[4] El-Salam, M. M. A., & Abu-Zuid, G. I. (2015). Impact of landfill leachate on the groundwater quality: A case study in Egypt. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(4), 579–586.
[5] Erdem, M. (2022). Designing a sustainable logistics network for hazardous medical waste collection: A case study in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376, 134-192.
[6] Ghosh, P., Gupta, A., & Thakur, I. S. (2015). Combined chemical and toxicological evaluation of leachate from municipal solid waste landfill sites of Delhi, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(12), 9148–9158.
[7] Gibis, B., Artiles, J., Corabian, P., Meiesaar, K., Koppel, A., & Jacobs, P. (2001). Application of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis in the development of a health technology assessment program. Health Policy, 58, 27–35
[8] Gworek B., Dmuchowski W., Gozdowski D., Koda E., Osiecka R., Borzyszkowski (2015).
[9] J. Influence of a Municipal Waste Landfill on the Spatial Distribution of Mercury in the Environment PLoS One, 10(7), 2015.
[10] Heinold, A., & Meisel, F. (2018). Emission rates of intermodal rail/road and road-only transportation in Europe: A comprehensive simulation study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 421–437.
[11] Kansal, A., Prasad, R. K., & Gupta, S. (1998). Delhi municipal solid waste and environment – An appraisal. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 18(2), 123–128.
[12] Kausal, R. K., Varghese, G. K., & Chabukdhara, M. (2012). Municipal solid waste management in India Current state and future challenges: A review. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 4(4), 1473–1489.
[13] Kaza, S., Yao, L. C., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. World Bank.
[14] Koda, E., Miszkowska, A., & Sieczka, A. (2017). Levels of organic pollution indicators in groundwater at the old landfill and waste management site. Applied Sciences, 7(6), 638.
[15] Koda, E., Osinski, P., Sieczka, A., & Wychowaniak, D. (2015). Areal distribution of ammonium contamination of soil-water environment in the vicinity of old municipal landfill site with vertical barrier. Water, 7(6), 2656–2672.
[16] Nagarajan, R., Thirumalaisamy, S., & Lakshumanan, E. (2012). Impact of leachate on groundwater pollution due to non-engineered municipal solid waste landfill sites of Erode city, Tamil Nadu, India. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 9(1), 35.
[17] Ohe, T., Watanabe, T., & Wakabayashi, K. (2004). Mutagens in surface waters: A review. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, 567(2–3), 109–149.
[18] Sari, N., Amrina, D. H., & Rahmah, N. A. (2021). The impact of household trash on the environment and economy for people in Sukarame Subdistrict, Bandar Lampung City from an Islamic view. Holistic Journal of Management Research, 6(2), 42–59.
[19] Singh.S and Tripathi. I.P. (2011) source implication and management of the solid waste of Chitrakoot Ph.D. Thesis, M.G.C.G.V, Chitrakoot (Satna)MP.
[20] Srivastava, P. K., Kulshreshtha, K., Mohanty, C. S., Pushpangadan, P., & Singh, A. (2005). Stakeholder based SWOT analysis for successful municipal solid waste management in Lucknow, India. Waste Management, 25, 531–537.
[21] Tavares, G., Zsigraiova, Z., Semiao, V., & Carvalho, M. D. G. (2009). Optimisation of MSW collection routes for minimum fuel consumption using 3D GIS modelling. Waste Management, 29(3), 1176–1185.
[22] Wolny-Ko?adka, K., & Malinowski, M. (2015). Assessment of the microbiological contamination of air in a municipal solid waste treatment company. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering A, 22(2), 175–183.
[23] Yoada, R. M., Chirawurah, D., & Adongo, P. B. (2014). Domestic waste disposal practice and perceptions of private sector waste management in urban Accra. BMC Public Health, 14, 697.